🔗 Share this article

As a game master, I historically shied away from heavy use of randomization during my D&D sessions. I preferred was for the plot and what happened in a game to be determined by player choice rather than pure luck. However, I chose to try something different, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Inspiration: Watching an Improvised Tool

A popular actual-play show features a DM who frequently asks for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. This involves choosing a type of die and outlining potential outcomes contingent on the number. It's essentially no unlike rolling on a random table, these are devised on the spot when a player's action has no obvious conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own session, mainly because it looked novel and offered a break from my usual habits. The results were eye-opening, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing balance between planning and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

A Powerful Session Moment

In a recent session, my group had concluded a massive conflict. Afterwards, a player wondered if two key NPCs—a brother and sister—had made it. Instead of deciding myself, I let the dice decide. I asked the player to roll a d20. The stakes were: on a 1-4, both would perish; on a 5-9, a single one would die; a high roll, they survived.

The die came up a 4. This led to a incredibly poignant sequence where the adventurers found the remains of their companions, forever united in death. The cleric performed last rites, which was particularly significant due to previous roleplaying. In a concluding gesture, I chose that the remains were miraculously transformed, showing a spell-storing object. By chance, the item's magical effect was perfectly what the group needed to solve another critical quest obstacle. It's impossible to orchestrate this type of serendipitous coincidences.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This experience led me to ponder if randomization and thinking on your feet are in fact the beating heart of this game. Although you are a meticulously planning DM, your skill to pivot can rust. Groups often take delight in upending the most detailed plans. Therefore, a effective DM needs to be able to think quickly and create details in the moment.

Using similar mechanics is a fantastic way to develop these abilities without venturing too far outside your preparation. The key is to apply them for minor situations that won't drastically alter the overarching story. As an example, I wouldn't use it to establish if the central plot figure is a traitor. Instead, I would consider using it to decide if the PCs arrive just in time to see a major incident takes place.

Empowering Player Agency

Luck rolls also helps maintain tension and cultivate the impression that the game world is responsive, shaping according to their choices as they play. It prevents the sense that they are merely actors in a pre-written script, thereby strengthening the shared aspect of roleplaying.

This philosophy has always been integral to the original design. Early editions were enamored with charts, which suited a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. While modern D&D frequently focuses on plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the required method.

Striking the Sweet Spot

It is perfectly no issue with thorough preparation. But, there is also no issue with relinquishing control and letting the rolls to determine certain outcomes in place of you. Authority is a big aspect of a DM's job. We use it to manage the world, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, at times when doing so could be beneficial.

My final recommendation is this: Do not fear of temporarily losing control. Try a little randomness for smaller details. You might just discover that the organic story beat is infinitely more rewarding than anything you could have pre-written on your own.